The Ragnarok is here. The Ragnarok is now.
Compare
Bare Knuckle Ragnarok vs Gibson Dirty Fingers SM Onyx
Bare Knuckle Ragnarok
neck humbucker
82 match
low confidence
Gibson Dirty Fingers SM Onyx
humbucker
We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | Bare Knuckle Ragnarok | Gibson Dirty Fingers SM Onyx |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 15.8k | 15k |
| Inductance | not measured | not measured |
| Magnet | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Coil | Hum-cancelling | Hum-cancelling |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | 8 / 10 | no chart |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | 9 / 10 | no chart |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | 5 / 10 | no chart |
| Slotdiffers | neck humbucker | humbucker |
| Traits | high output, dark, mid-forward, big low end, tight & aggressive | high output, tight & aggressive |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
93
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).
Videos
Bare Knuckle Ragnarok
Ragnarok humbucker set demonstration by Connor Kaminski
Gibson Dirty Fingers SM Onyx
No videos of its own collected yet.
What players and reviewers say
On the Bare Knuckle Ragnarok
“The combination of a substantial low end, strong mids and controlled highs gives the pickup enough personality to remain interesting as the gain comes down.”
“The ceramic magnets, substantial output, focused low end, aggressive midrange, and controlled high end give it the characteristics needed for modern progressive metal and other demanding high-gain applications.”
Full reviews
Bare Knuckle Ragnarok
Gibson Dirty Fingers SM Onyx
None collected yet.