Compare

DiMarzio Air Norton S vs Seymour Duncan Little '59 (SL59-1)

medium confidence

Compared with the DiMarzio Air Norton S, the Seymour Duncan Little '59 (SL59-1) has a brighter top end.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecDiMarzio Air Norton SSeymour Duncan Little '59 (SL59-1)
DC resistancediffers11.21k11.78k
Inductancediffersnot measured7.89 H (measured, 2 readings)
MagnetCeramicCeramic
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Resonant peakdiffers—4.6 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load)
Bass (tone chart)differsEach maker grades its own chart, so read these within a brand5 / 106 / 10
Mids (tone chart)differsEach maker grades its own chart, so read these within a brand6.25 / 105 / 10
Treble (tone chart)differsEach maker grades its own chart, so read these within a brand3.5 / 107 / 10
SlotdiffersStrat single-coilbridge Strat single-coil
Traitshigh output, dark, tight & aggressive, noiselesshigh output, tight & aggressive, noiseless

How close on each spec

100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works

Output
93
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Brightness
59
each against its maker's average
Mids
69
each against its maker's average
Bass
90
each against its maker's average

Videos

DiMarzio Air Norton S

No videos of its own collected yet.

Seymour Duncan Little '59 (SL59-1)

Fender Stratocaster - Seymour Duncan Little '59
Tom Roger Thu

What players and reviewers say

On the Seymour Duncan Little '59 (SL59-1)

“In this particular guitar, the little 59 is hollow sounding, bright and lacks output..”
MrDan666 · 2010-03-29Rig-Talk ↗ (opens in a new tab)
“I like the 59 too, but the SL seems to punch the mids out there a little more, and it's still slightly warmer, maybe due partially to the nickel cover.”
Stevo · 2004-05-09Seymour Duncan forum ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the Seymour Duncan Little '59 (SL59-1) →

Full reviews