Compare
DiMarzio Evolution vs Seymour Duncan Nazgul
DiMarzio Evolution
bridge humbucker
83 match
low confidence
Seymour Duncan Nazgul
bridge humbucker
We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | DiMarzio Evolution | Seymour Duncan Nazgul |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 13.84k | 13.6k |
| Inductancediffers | 6.15 H (measured, 1 reading) | not measured |
| Magnet | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Coil | Hum-cancelling | Hum-cancelling |
| Resonant peakdiffers | — | 4.74 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | 7 / 10 | no chart |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | 6 / 10 | no chart |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | 5 / 10 | no chart |
| Slot | bridge humbucker | bridge humbucker |
| Traits | moderate output, big low end, tight & aggressive | high output, tight & aggressive |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
97
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).
Videos
No videos for either pickup collected yet.
What players and reviewers say
On the DiMarzio Evolution
“Tread in to the low end and the notes retain clarity.”
Full reviews
DiMarzio Evolution
Seymour Duncan Nazgul
None collected yet.