Compare

DiMarzio PAF 57 vs Gibson 57 Classic

Different slots, so no score

The DiMarzio PAF 57 is a bridge humbucker and the Gibson 57 Classic is a neck humbucker, so one won't drop into the other's slot. Their specs are still side by side below.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecDiMarzio PAF 57Gibson 57 Classic
DC resistancediffers8.63k8k
Inductancediffers4.67 H (measured, 1 reading)not measured
MagnetAlnico 2Alnico 2
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Bass (tone chart)differs3.5 / 10no chart
Mids (tone chart)differs4.75 / 10no chart
Treble (tone chart)differs5.5 / 10no chart
Slotdiffersbridge humbuckerneck humbucker
Traitsvintage output, soft & warmvintage output, soft & warm

Videos

DiMarzio PAF 57

No videos of its own collected yet.

Gibson 57 Classic

Gibson 57 Classic Pickups Demo (No Commentary)
Joey the Guitar Player
Humbucker Shootout: Gibson Classic 57s Vs. Burstbucker Pro
Visual Guy · comparison

What players and reviewers say

Players comparing them

Sound nothing like the Gibson 57 Classic to me…..which I find boxy and blurry sounding. The Dimarzios are really open and clear.
EyesOfTheSouth! · Mar 1, 2024Rig-Talk (opens in a new tab)

On the DiMarzio PAF 57

The creamy bold low end and the sweetly precise highs.
Darth Phineas · May 1, 2024Darth Phineas (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the DiMarzio PAF 57

On the Gibson 57 Classic

I can see why people say they can be muddy, but I like the fatness they bring to the sound.
boost · Dec 5, 2017Rig-Talk (opens in a new tab)
The '57 classics were really nice in this guitar, but I did find the neck a bit muddy and the bridge at bit harsh in the highs.
blackba · Dec 5, 2017Rig-Talk (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the Gibson 57 Classic

Full reviews