Compare

Fishman Fluence Mick Thomson vs Fishman Fluence Richard Z Kruspe Signature Ceramic

Fishman Fluence Mick Thomson pickup
Photo: Fishman (opens in a new tab)
Fishman Fluence Mick Thomson
active bridge humbucker
low confidence
Fishman Fluence Richard Z Kruspe Signature Ceramic pickup
Photo: Fishman (opens in a new tab)

We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecFishman Fluence Mick ThomsonFishman Fluence Richard Z Kruspe Signature Ceramic
DC resistancenot publishednot published
Inductancenot measurednot measured
MagnetCeramicCeramic
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Resonant peakdiffers0.63 kHz (Fishman's own test load)—
Slotactive bridge humbuckeractive bridge humbucker
Traitsactive, tight & aggressiveactive, tight & aggressive

How close on each spec

100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works

Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type

Not compared: output, brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).

Videos

No videos for either pickup collected yet.

What players and reviewers say

No forum posts or review excerpts for either pickup collected yet.