Compare
Friedman Classic 90 vs Seymour Duncan Vintage P-90 Soapbar (SP90-1)
Friedman Classic 90
neck P-90 soapbar
82 match
low confidence
Seymour Duncan Vintage P-90 Soapbar (SP90-1)
neck P-90 soapbar
We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | Friedman Classic 90 | Seymour Duncan Vintage P-90 Soapbar (SP90-1) |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 8.6k | 8.22k |
| Inductance | not measured | not measured |
| Magnet | Alnico 5 | Alnico 5 |
| Coil | Single coil | Single coil |
| Resonant peakdiffers | — | 4.3 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | no chart | 5 / 10 |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | no chart | 5 / 10 |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | no chart | 7 / 10 |
| Slot | neck P-90 soapbar | neck P-90 soapbar |
| Traits | moderate output | vintage output |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
93
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Alnico 5
Coil
100
same coil type
Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).
Videos
No videos for either pickup collected yet.
What players and reviewers say
No forum posts or review excerpts for either pickup collected yet.