Compare

Gibson 490T "Modern Classic" vs Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecGibson 490T "Modern Classic"Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)
DC resistancediffers8.2k8.21k
Inductancediffersnot measured5.10 H (measured, 1 reading)
MagnetAlnico 2Alnico 2
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Resonant peakdiffers6.5 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load)
Bass (tone chart)differsno chart6 / 10
Mids (tone chart)differsno chart5 / 10
Treble (tone chart)differsno chart9 / 10
Slotbridge humbuckerbridge humbucker
Traitsvintage output, soft & warmvintage output, bright, soft & warm

How close on each spec

100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works

Output
100
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Alnico 2
Coil
100
same coil type

Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).

Videos

Gibson 490T "Modern Classic"

No videos of its own collected yet.

Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

What players and reviewers say

On the Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

To me they cover a lot of the same ground, but the BB3 seems less shrill in the high end.
Mpcoluv · Sep 14, 2012Seymour Duncan forum (opens in a new tab)
The general consensus happens to be that the bridge is bright and the neck is dark.
Darth Phineas · Apr 4, 2018Darth Phineas (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

Full reviews