Compare

Gibson 57 Classic vs Seymour Duncan Seth Lover Model (SH-55)

We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecGibson 57 ClassicSeymour Duncan Seth Lover Model (SH-55)
DC resistancediffers8k8.1k
Inductance4.83 H (measured, 1 reading)4.83 H (measured, 1 reading)
MagnetAlnico 2Alnico 2
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Resonant peakdiffers5.9 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load)
Bass (tone chart)differsno chart6 / 10
Mids (tone chart)differsno chart4 / 10
Treble (tone chart)differsno chart8 / 10
Slotdiffershumbuckerbridge humbucker
Traitsvintage output, soft & warmvintage output, soft & warm

How close on each spec

100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works

Output
100
measured inductance
Magnet
100
both Alnico 2
Coil
100
same coil type

Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).

Videos

Gibson 57 Classic

Gibson 57 Classic Pickups Demo (No Commentary)
Joey the Guitar Player
Humbucker Shootout: Gibson Classic 57s Vs. Burstbucker Pro
Visual Guy · comparison

Seymour Duncan Seth Lover Model (SH-55)

What players and reviewers say

On the Gibson 57 Classic

Sound nothing like the Gibson 57 Classic to me…..which I find boxy and blurry sounding. The Dimarzios are really open and clear.
Comparing with DiMarzio PAF 57
EyesOfTheSouth! · Mar 1, 2024Rig-Talk (opens in a new tab)
I can see why people say they can be muddy, but I like the fatness they bring to the sound.
boost · Dec 5, 2017Rig-Talk (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the Gibson 57 Classic

Full reviews