Compare
Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 42 Tele vs Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B)
Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 42 Tele
bridge Tele pickup
65 match
low confidence
Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B)
bridge Tele pickup
Compared with the Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 42 Tele, the Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B) has hotter output.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 42 Tele | Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B) |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 6.7k | 17k |
| Inductance | not measured | not measured |
| Magnet | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Coil | Hum-cancelling | Hum-cancelling |
| Resonant peakdiffers | — | 3.4 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | no chart | 6 / 10 |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | no chart | 6 / 10 |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | no chart | 5 / 10 |
| Slot | bridge Tele pickup | bridge Tele pickup |
| Traits | vintage output, tight & aggressive, noiseless | high output, dark, tight & aggressive, noiseless |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
0
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).
Videos
No videos for either pickup collected yet.
What players and reviewers say
On the Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B)
“You're really looking for a woody, clear, articulate character that can even also be considered chimey.”
“The vibe is open with slightly controlled lows and crisp highs.”
Full reviews
Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 42 Tele
None collected yet.