Seymour Duncan Little 59 Review (SL59-1B) How well does it fit into a Strat?
Compare
Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 43 Tele vs Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B)
Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 43 Tele
bridge Tele pickup
71 match
low confidence
Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B)
bridge Tele pickup
Compared with the Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 43 Tele, the Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B) has hotter output.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 43 Tele | Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B) |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 10.6k | 17k |
| Inductance | not measured | not measured |
| Magnet | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Coil | Hum-cancelling | Hum-cancelling |
| Resonant peakdiffers | — | 3.4 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | no chart | 6 / 10 |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | no chart | 6 / 10 |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | no chart | 5 / 10 |
| Slot | bridge Tele pickup | bridge Tele pickup |
| Traits | high output, tight & aggressive, noiseless | high output, dark, tight & aggressive, noiseless |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
32
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).
Videos
Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 43 Tele
No videos of its own collected yet.
Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B)
I Tried The Seymour Duncan Little '59 - Is It Worth The Hype?
What players and reviewers say
On the Seymour Duncan Little '59 (ST59-1B)
“In this particular guitar, the little 59 is hollow sounding, bright and lacks output..”
“I like the 59 too, but the SL seems to punch the mids out there a little more, and it's still slightly warmer, maybe due partially to the nickel cover.”
Full reviews
Lindy Fralin Steel Pole 43 Tele
None collected yet.