Compare
Lollar 52 T vs Seymour Duncan Alnico II Pro Lead (APTL-1)
Lollar 52 T
bridge Tele pickup
81 match
low confidence
Seymour Duncan Alnico II Pro Lead (APTL-1)
bridge Tele pickup
We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | Lollar 52 T | Seymour Duncan Alnico II Pro Lead (APTL-1) |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 6.8k | 6.2k |
| Inductancediffers | 3.30 H (compiled) | not measured |
| Magnet | Alnico 2 | Alnico 2 |
| Coil | Single coil | Single coil |
| Resonant peakdiffers | — | 8.5 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | no chart | 5 / 10 |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | no chart | 2 / 10 |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | no chart | 5 / 10 |
| Slot | bridge Tele pickup | bridge Tele pickup |
| Traits | moderate output, soft & warm | vintage output, dark, scooped mids, soft & warm |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
87
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Alnico 2
Coil
100
same coil type
Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).
Videos
No videos for either pickup collected yet.
What players and reviewers say
On the Seymour Duncan Alnico II Pro Lead (APTL-1)
“Highs are a little sweet and lows are spongey but not flabby.”
“If you have a really bright guitar or seem to have a habit of choosing pickups with too much ice-pick high end, the Alnico II Pro could be a consideration.”
Full reviews
Lollar 52 T
None collected yet.