Compare

Lollar Imperial vs Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

medium confidence

We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecLollar ImperialSeymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)
DC resistancediffers7.6k7.3k
Inductancediffers4.09 H (compiled)4.15 H (measured, 1 reading)
MagnetAlnico 2Alnico 2
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Resonant peakdiffers7.5 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load)
Bass (tone chart)differsno chart6 / 10
Mids (tone chart)differsno chart5 / 10
Treble (tone chart)differsno chart9 / 10
Slotneck humbuckerneck humbucker
Traitsvintage output, soft & warmvintage output, bright, soft & warm

How close on each spec

100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works

Output
98
measured inductance
Magnet
100
both Alnico 2
Coil
100
same coil type

Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).

Videos

Lollar Imperial

Paul Rose - Lollar Pickups, Imperial Humbuckers (medium wound)
Paul Rose
Humbucker Shootout: Lollar Pickups - Imperial vs. Imperial Low Wind
Visual Guy · comparison

Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

What players and reviewers say

On the Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

To me they cover a lot of the same ground, but the BB3 seems less shrill in the high end.
Mpcoluv · Sep 14, 2012Seymour Duncan forum (opens in a new tab)
The general consensus happens to be that the bridge is bright and the neck is dark.
Darth Phineas · Apr 4, 2018Darth Phineas (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the Seymour Duncan Pearly Gates (SHPG-1)

Full reviews