Compare
Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13) vs Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8)
Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13)
bridge humbucker
86 match
high confidence
Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8)
bridge humbucker
Compared with the Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13), the Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8) has more midrange.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13) | Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8) |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 16.25k | 16.8k |
| Inductancediffers | not measured | 8.51 H (measured, 1 reading) |
| Magnet | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Coil | Hum-cancelling | Hum-cancelling |
| Resonant peakdiffers | 5.1 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) | 5 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | 5 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | 8 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Slot | bridge humbucker | bridge humbucker |
| Traits | high output, tight & aggressive | high output, dark, mid-forward, big low end, tight & aggressive |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
95
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Brightness
94
tone charts on the same scale
Mids
50
tone charts on the same scale
Bass
83
tone charts on the same scale
Videos
No videos for either pickup collected yet.
What players and reviewers say
On the Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8)
“Lows are thick and robust, where highs are present and have cut.”
“The mid range snarl is about big enough to use as a runway for a commercial airliner.”
Full reviews
Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13)
None collected yet.