Compare

Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13) vs Wolfetone BlisterBucker

We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecSeymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13)Wolfetone BlisterBucker
DC resistancediffers16.25k16k
Inductancenot measurednot measured
MagnetCeramicCeramic
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Resonant peakdiffers5.1 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load)—
Bass (tone chart)differs6 / 10no chart
Mids (tone chart)differs5 / 10no chart
Treble (tone chart)differs8 / 10no chart
Slotdiffersbridge humbuckerhumbucker
Traitshigh output, tight & aggressivehigh output, tight & aggressive

How close on each spec

100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works

Output
98
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type

Not compared: brightness, mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).

Videos

Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13)

Wes Hauch- Seymour Duncan Dimebucker Set Demo
Keith Merrow

Wolfetone BlisterBucker

No videos of its own collected yet.

What players and reviewers say

On the Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13)

“I prefer to run an EQ in the loop to boost low end on it, so that way when you switch guitars like say to the Dimebucker your bass setting on your amp won't be too much.”
mustaine-who? · 2010-02-05Seymour Duncan forum ↗ (opens in a new tab)
“I have one in my Soloist and its different from the Dimebucker or X2n which have the tight low end chainsaw sound, but if your lookin for palm mutes and heavy riffage, the Alt8 can do no wrong.”
MetalManiac · 2010-05-27Seymour Duncan forum ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the Seymour Duncan Dimebucker (SH-13) →