Compare
Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8) vs Seymour Duncan Nazgul
Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8)
7-string bridge humbucker
78 match
medium confidence
Seymour Duncan Nazgul
7-string bridge humbucker
Compared with the Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8), the Seymour Duncan Nazgul has lower output and a brighter top end.
Specs side by side
differs marks specs where they part ways| Spec | Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8) | Seymour Duncan Nazgul |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistancediffers | 19.5k | 16.52k |
| Inductance | not measured | not measured |
| Magnet | Ceramic | Ceramic |
| Coil | Hum-cancelling | Hum-cancelling |
| Resonant peakdiffers | 3.72 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) | 4.28 kHz (Seymour Duncan's own test load) |
| Bass (tone chart)differs | no chart | 5 / 10 |
| Mids (tone chart)differs | no chart | 9 / 10 |
| Treble (tone chart)differs | no chart | 8 / 10 |
| Slot | 7-string bridge humbucker | 7-string bridge humbucker |
| Traits | high output, tight & aggressive | high output, mid-forward, tight & aggressive |
How close on each spec
100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works
Output
76
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Brightness
60
the maker's resonant peaks
Not compared: mids, bass (a spec is missing for at least one of them).
Videos
No videos for either pickup collected yet.
What players and reviewers say
On the Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8)
“Lows are thick and robust, where highs are present and have cut.”
“The mid range snarl is about big enough to use as a runway for a commercial airliner.”
Full reviews
Seymour Duncan Invader (SH-8)
Seymour Duncan Nazgul
None collected yet.