no spec differences found
Output compared on measured inductance; tone charts compared directly.

A humbucker with an Alnico 5 magnet and vintage output.
vintage output
From DiMarzio's published specs ↗ (opens in a new tab). Traits come from these specs by stated rules.
Upgrading from the DiMarzio Mo' Joe? Put it on the map and see what sits where you want your tone to go.
Each score is how close a pickup is on measured specs, out of 100. The meter shows how many of those specs we could compare; a grey score means few could be. Filters cover the top 40. How scoring works
no spec differences found
Output compared on measured inductance; tone charts compared directly.
no spec differences found
Output compared on measured inductance; tone charts compared against each maker's average.
hotter output
Output compared on measured inductance; tone charts compared directly.
lower output
Output compared on measured inductance; tone charts compared directly.
no spec differences found
Output compared on measured inductance; tone charts compared against each maker's average.
no spec differences found
Output compared on measured inductance; tone charts compared against each maker's average.
Demos, reviews and forum posts, quoted word for word and linked to where they were published. No player posts collected yet.
“Physically, the Mo’ Joe feels very much like the modern DiMarzio standard: clean build quality, tight bobbin alignment, smooth legwork, and consistent winding.”
“The lows stay punchy, the mids remain broad and vocal, and the highs cut clearly without becoming harsh.”
Played the DiMarzio Mo' Joe?
Tell other players how it sounds in your guitar. These are visitors' own comments: checked for spam before they appear, but not fact-checked like the sourced quotes above.
Loading comments…