no spec differences found
No inductance for one of them, so output leans on DC resistance; tone charts compared directly.

A bridge mini-humbucker with a ceramic magnet and vintage output.
vintage outputtight & aggressive
From DiMarzio's published specs ↗ (opens in a new tab). Traits come from these specs by stated rules.
Upgrading from the DiMarzio PG-13? Put it on the map and see what sits where you want your tone to go.
Each score is how close a pickup is on measured specs, out of 100. The meter shows how many of those specs we could compare; a grey score means few could be. How scoring works
no spec differences found
No inductance for one of them, so output leans on DC resistance; tone charts compared directly.
hotter output · tighter low end
No inductance for one of them, so output leans on DC resistance; tone charts compared against each maker's average.
Alnico V magnet: warmer, smoother
No inductance for one of them, so output leans on DC resistance; tone charts compared against each maker's average.
lower output · tighter low end
No inductance for one of them, so output leans on DC resistance; tone charts compared directly.
lower output · Alnico V magnet: warmer, smoother
No inductance for one of them, so output leans on DC resistance; no tone chart to compare.
lower output · Alnico V magnet: warmer, smoother · scooped mids · tighter low end
No inductance for one of them, so output leans on DC resistance; tone charts compared against each maker's average.
Demos, reviews and forum posts, quoted word for word and linked to where they were published. No player posts collected yet.
“The neck position delivers jazzy comps and bluesy licks with a clean low end and vocal mids.”
“It has less mids and more high end than the bridge.”
Played the DiMarzio PG-13?
Tell other players how it sounds in your guitar. These are visitors' own comments: checked for spam before they appear, but not fact-checked like the sourced quotes above.
Loading comments…