Compare

DiMarzio BC-1 vs DiMarzio The Tone Zone S

high confidence

We found no spec differences between them worth calling out.

Specs side by side

differs marks specs where they part ways
SpecDiMarzio BC-1DiMarzio The Tone Zone S
DC resistancediffers11.62k12.39k
Inductancenot measurednot measured
MagnetCeramicCeramic
CoilHum-cancellingHum-cancelling
Bass (tone chart)differs5.5 / 106 / 10
Mids (tone chart)differs6.5 / 108.25 / 10
Treble (tone chart)differs2.5 / 103 / 10
SlotStrat single-coilStrat single-coil
Traitshigh output, dark, mid-forward, tight & aggressive, noiselesshigh output, dark, mid-forward, tight & aggressive, noiseless

How close on each spec

100 means identical on that spec. The score weighs these, and counts anything we couldn't compare as a typical difference. How scoring works

Output
91
DC resistance (no inductance for one of them)
Magnet
100
both Ceramic
Coil
100
same coil type
Brightness
92
tone charts on the same scale
Mids
71
tone charts on the same scale
Bass
92
tone charts on the same scale

Videos

DiMarzio BC-1

No videos of its own collected yet.

DiMarzio The Tone Zone S

What players and reviewers say

On the DiMarzio BC-1

“For cleans, well, ANS or BC-1 are darker & hotter, but with more harmonics..”
Despair · 2010-03-01Seymour Duncan forum ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the DiMarzio BC-1 →

On the DiMarzio The Tone Zone S

“I prefer the FS2 for its midrange and clarity, but I also like the Tone Zone S more for the bridge and the Pro Track for the middle and neck to be honest.”
Comparing with DiMarzio Pro Track
6string40 · 2010-09-16Rig-Talk ↗ (opens in a new tab)
“For me, Tone Zone S is too muddy, boomy, bass-heavy.”
racerevlon · 2011-11-12Rig-Talk ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Everything on the DiMarzio The Tone Zone S →

Full reviews

DiMarzio BC-1

None collected yet.